Let’s suppose that a compliance system is worth $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a lot?
It’s all about what you’re replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours tedious evidence gathering in a complex technology-driven environment, $12,000 could be well-spent. The math would be different in the event that a small group of people could collect the same information in only a few minutes each month.
It is a great method to search for Vanta alternatives. Don’t start by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask your business how these tools can help you save time and money.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. Scale can alter its value. Imagine a company growing in technology with hundreds of employees, many cloud environments, many applications, and constant access changes. The strain of manually gathering evidence over time could become extremely heavy. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence could easily justify the expense.
Imagine a small-scale business of 10 people getting ready to go through its first SOC 2. audit. Imagine a startup having 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. While a well-developed platform can have a lot of features but they only have value when the organization is in need of them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a comparison that can easily become a feature-by feature exercise. It is essential to look at the services, features as well as the quotes and contracts of both platforms. Both are established compliance platforms that concentrate on integrations and automation.
There’s a second decision that you must take. Do you require a system for compliance that is integrated? Certain companies require continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to produce their own evidence, especially in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Use the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. On the market, there are platforms with a simpler design which are focused more on system organization instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It offers editable policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also permits auditors to look over evidence by gaining restricted access.
It is not able to connect to operational systems, nor does it install infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the documents they would like to present.
Be aware of the system’s access.
It is clear that cutting off integrations is a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
It also removes the need for integration setup and means the compliance application does not require standing connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to the other. The relevant question is which choice is best for your business.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 people. Its pricing is published rather than requiring a sales call to get the initial cost. The initial price listed for CertAssist is $225 per monthly instead of the standard $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The needs of a 10-person company today may not be its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
The compliance can be maintained using a the use of a simple platform. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence demands increase, the economics could eventually favour deeper automation. Better to let the complexity of compliance technology take its place.
Affording fifty integrations because they look good in a comparison table isn’t worth it. They should be paid for only if they are necessary and the cost for doing the work manually is more expensive.