Let’s say a compliance platform cost $12,000 annually. Is it expensive?
It all depends on the item you are replacing.
If you invest $12,000 to eliminate hundreds of hours in repetitive evidence gathering across an extremely complex technology environment It could be wisely invested. If a startup with seven employees could manually gather the same evidence in two hours per month, the result differs.
This is a good method of looking for a Vanta alternative. Do not start with asking which platform offers the greatest features. Ask what those features will bring your company savings in time and energy.
Automated Manufacturing has an Break-Even Point
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically beneficial or harmful. The importance of automation for compliance will change as the company expands. Imagine an expanding technology company with multiple cloud environments and many applications. It is possible to manually collect evidence, which could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automately monitor systems and collect evidence can quickly justify their cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees working on their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup having 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
This is an important distinction to consider when looking at Vanta’s pricing. A modern platform may provide large capabilities, but those capabilities will only be of value when an organization actually requires them.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are trusted compliance platforms built around automation and integrations. As such, the comparison of their frameworks supported and integrations, services, contracts, and individual quotations are useful for businesses seeking that approach.
But there’s still another decision you have to make. Do you want a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain companies want automated evidence collection and continuous monitoring. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. There are platforms with a lighter design that are more focused on organization rather than connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes the framework controls into a single work space and provides editable guidance on policy as well as evidence. Auditors can examine the evidence through a restricted interface.
It is not able to connect to operational systems, nor does it create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own evidence.
Consideration should be given to the system’s access.
It is clear that cutting off integrations could have disadvantages. It is necessary to collect evidence manually.
This means that there is no need for integration, and the use of compliance does not require a connection to the operational environment.
The structures of one are not superior to the other. The important question is which choice is best for your company.
CertAssist will target teams of between five to 200 members. The pricing of the service is announced instead of requiring an appointment with sales representatives to find the initial figure. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 monthly in comparison to the standard $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The requirements for a start-up with 10 employees are not necessarily similar to the needs of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
Compliance can be managed with a simple platform. The cost of automation could grow as systems, staff and frameworks increase. Let complexity be the primary factor when you purchase compliance technology.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look great in a comparison table isn’t worth the cost. They’re well worth the money to perform the tasks they automate is more expensive than doing them manually.